This structured process leverages the deep expertise of the AIFRA Board to create a rigorous, transparent and accountable credentialing system. The multi-layered evaluation, provisions for appeals, and engagement of independent experts ensures consistent, high-quality credential determinations. Matching Board Member assessors based on regulatory domains provides knowledgeable, authoritative oversight.
Instituting this process positions AIFRA as a leader in regulatory professional development across Africa. The mix of Board Members with academic, research, practice and policy leadership backgrounds creates a robust governance framework for cementing credibility. The detailed assessment metrics, structured evaluation, and ongoing auditing sets a benchmark for excellence among professional credentialing bodies globally.
- Application Submission
– Applicants submit their application package including transcripts, work experience details, training certificates, competency assessment materials, thought leadership samples, and fee payment.
– Applications are screened for completeness by AIFRA administrative staff. Incomplete applications are returned.
- Portfolio Review and Scoring
– Complete application packages are assigned to a Portfolio Review Committee consisting of at least 2 AIFRA Board Members and 1 external subject matter expert in the applicant’s regulatory domain.
– The committee uses the Assessment system and metrics detailed in the “Assessment system and metrics” document to evaluate and score each component of the portfolio.
– Academic records are verified and scored based on relevance.
– Work experience is validated and rated on scope and impact.
– Training and continuous learning is scored based on AIFRA course completion and other programs.
– Competency assessment materials are evaluated and scored.
– Thought leadership and service contributions are rated.
– Scores are totaled and the portfolio is provisionally placed into a credential level category (Associate, Professional, Specialist).
- Evaluator Assignments and Interviews
– Provisionally categorized portfolios are assigned to an Evaluation Panel consisting of 2 AIFRA Board Members whose background aligns with the candidate’s domain.
– The Panel conducts an in-depth review of the portfolio to assess readiness for the designated credential level.
– The Panel interviews the candidate to discuss their portfolio, experience, and knowledge in detail. They assess communication, critical thinking and leadership competencies.
– Based on the portfolio and interview, the Panel makes a final recommendation on granting the credential at the provisionally assigned level.
- Credentialing Decisions
– The AIFRA Board Chairperson reviews the Portfolio Review scoring and Evaluation Panel recommendations for each candidate.
– The Chairperson makes the decision to approve or reject the credential, or to request additional information.
– For approved credentials, the Chair specifies if any special commendations or restrictions apply.
- Appeals Process
– Candidates not approved for credentialing at their proposed level can appeal the decision.
– Appeals are heard by a 3-member panel including the Board Chairperson, Executive Secretary and one independent Board Member.
– The appeals panel reviews the original portfolio scoring, evaluation panel notes, and any additional submitted materials.
– The panel makes a final binding decision on the credential level.
- Credential Awarding and Renewal
– Approved candidates are notified and awarded their credential certificate after paying the designated fees.
– Credentials are valid for 5 years. Renewals require submitting an updated portfolio demonstrating continued training, experience and contributions.
– Random audits of credential holder portfolios are conducted annually to ensure continued eligibility.
